Theory: Slander As A Main Weapon
Slander about another is used in sick organizations to try to negate the work of another, destroy their credibility, destroy their legacy, destroy their reputation, destroy their career, etc. The slander can be about almost any subject: He is crazy, lazy, unreliable, never on time, promiscuous, a poor worker, a wife beater, an animal abuser, a liar, a drunk, a drug user, etc., etc. The slander is usually done by a sick/bully boss who is jealous of the worker (worker shows up the boss by having better facilities, getting more recognition, being more observant, having more friends, etc.), a co-worker wanting the other worker's job, office, etc,, friends of the person starting the slander who are supporting their buddy in his attack, the leaders of a sick organization who are setting the worker up for a firing and trying to justify their firing actions by their slanders, other rivals at the organization, etc. The slanderer can be anyone at the organization; the reason for the slander can be anything, or nothing more than dislike. The original slander can also come from outside the organization (from an ex, enemy, neighbor, previous employer, etc.) and someone from the sick organization may pick up the slander to use as HIS OWN, probably thinking he can use the slander to destroy someone else for whatever reason he has for doing so.
Slander is usually committed by a dishonest person who may not be very smart; if he were honest and smart he would research to find the truth BEFORE he started/spread any slander (which could make him look like a fool if the slander is proven to be a LIE, or maybe lead to a lawsuit). There are those who will repeat the lie as often as they can to anyone who will listen, even to using their lies as a teaching "example" of a bad person to their students, interns, assistants, co-workers, etc. Others will repeat the lie as much as they can so eventually the lie is spread far and wide, and few know the origin of the lie, but hear the lie so often they begin to accept it as the truth. This also happens in political races.
There are some bosses/supervisors who will use their lies to try to ruin the careers of rivals, to get their facilities and workers taken away from the victim, to get their salaries reduced, to make life at the sick organization so difficult the person finds it hard to do the work necessary to silence the slanders of the bad boss, and any number of other things to try to destroy the rival, and get him kicked out of the "sandbox."
There are some slanderers whose brain gets "stuck" or "frozen" so much they are constantly thinking about getting their victim even up to 15 + years after the victim has retired and left the sick organization, and are constantly repeating the slanders to anyone who will listen.
What can the poor victim do? Usually very little. Those that know him know the truth. Others will believe about anything they want to believe; some just want to believe the worse about others because it makes good gossip. It is difficult to get a witness to testify in a slander case. Why? Those that slander usually have some sort of power over others and any potential witness is afraid to testify against such a person. If a lowly worker slanders another he can be easily fired and gotten rid of; if someone with power slanders another he is rarely challenged by those lower in power than him, and those above him support him, even in his lies, because he is a member of their power group. And this truly makes for a VERY SICK ORGANIZATION extending through a long period of time, in some cases for over 40 years.
And if the leaders of the sick organization believe the lies, they might persecute the victim by firing, ruining his career, giving him a pay cut, taking his facilities away, taking his workers away, etc., etc. So slander should be fought just as hard as if someone were trying to kill you, because they are trying to kill your career and future.
If the victim ever finds out, even years later, that one of his friends heard a slander from the slanderer or one of his cohorts, then the victim should jump on it to find out all the particulars and then counter the slander and slanderer by submitting EVIDENCE that the slander is a lie to the next highest authority (after the slanderer) in the organization, and say something like this, "I am giving you FIRST shot at correcting the slanders being put forth by so-and-so, on this date, at a gathering of various people, several who heard the slanders. The evidence countering the slanders and proving them to be lies is enclosed." If the next highest boss is also one of those persecuting you, then deal with the highest authority of the organization you can without upsetting their chain-of-command rules. Then include a detailed list of the possible options that may be available (that you are thinking about) against the offending organization and its slandering member(s); but make no threats.
If you make a public deal out of this situation a lot of people will just call you a disgruntled employee. You want to get the organization to handle it, so they do not come back on you; you are exercising your power over them by getting them to correct a situation they do not want to handle (how can they chastise their buddy?). They will want to keep things quiet, too; they do not want to be forced to admit that such actions against another happened at their organization, or on their watch, and thus have it become public knowledge.
You will never get total satisfaction out of the outcome; you will not get repair of your reputation for the years of slander, or money lost in your career due to their persecution. Even after providing proof that the slander is a lie there will be some who will still believe anything they want. The main office may do nothing more than to tell the offender to quit his slanders, and not punish him in any way (because he is so-o-o-o important to their program). They may not care that the slanderer treats many people badly and is a constant negative example for the organization. But you will get satisfaction of at least knowing you have proven to some that the slanders were lies.
If you are slandered, get your proof of the lie as fast as you can to the next highest authority in the organization above the slanderer, and calmly ask him to handle it. Slander can ruin careers, families, and the future, and is NOT to be taken lightly, but fought and proven to be lies (if for nothing else, just one's own peace of mind).
Every one of us will be slandered during his life by someone who does not like him for various reasons, or for no reason other than his presence/existence.
Adrian R. Lawler, Ph.D. , (C) 2012 --
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Theory: Kangaroo Court is One Weapon They Use
Theory: Kangaroo Court is One Weapon They Use
Sick organizations are fairly well known for their use of kangaroo courts to silence those that would question their actions, etc. They may initially call such courts "appeal hearings" or something similar, but in a sick organization the appeal hearing becomes a kangaroo court because you have now challenged the organization's "right" to do as they wish to you. They are going to defend their "right" to do as they wish to you, as their worker, and teach you a lesson. Kangaroo courts are generally held in response to an appeal you made to a decision they made (that you question) about you or your job.
Kangaroo Court is defined as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court
A kangaroo court is "a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted".
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Kangaroo+Court
An unfair, biased, or hasty judicial proceeding that ends in a harsh punishment; an unauthorized trial conducted by individuals who have taken the law into their own hands, such as those put on by vigilantes or prison inmates; a proceeding and its leaders who are considered sham, corrupt, and without regard for the law.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/kangaroo+court
any crudely or irregularly operated court, especially one so controlled as to render a fair trial impossible.
Kangaroo courts, by definition, are designed by the establishment so they win and you lose, and they teach you their lesson. They are mainly done to intimidate you and rest of staff, showing they can do anything to anybody at anytime, and that they are in control. A kangaroo court session is held to put someone down, to let them know who is boss, to stop criticism/talk before it gets started much, etc.
The Director/CEO of the sick organization usually chooses who will sit (usually 5 people) in judgement on the kangaroo court. They may give you one token choice of someone to sit at the hearing (they may ask for a list of several), and they choose one of those from your list who will judge you which will not mean anything in the final vote, because the vote is already rigged against you (4 votes to your one choice). This enables them to find out who ELSE thinks your way and needs to be controlled, so they can single them out for persecution, attitude adjustment, or firing, too. The kangaroo bunch gets together to question and beat up on you (their rules) and you have to sit there and take it while they go out for breaks, coffee, and to get more ammo (questions, charges) from other bullies not at "court" hearing.
They take great delight in watching you squirm and try to defend yourself against all sorts of charges against the sick organization, mostly various acts of supposed insubordination against your bully boss, false charges about your job performance, and your sayings to others. You cannot bring anyone in with you to help in your defense (like an attorney, or witness). They make up stuff, twist the truth, exaggerate, etc. everything so there is little truth anywhere in their charges against you. If they have instilled a little fear in you about what they can do, they have done what they wanted.
They have access to your personnel file where people have put anything they wanted for the time of your employment there. This is also "evidence" against you; you usually don't know what is in there and usually have no way to correct any false information. If you can, examine your personnel file to see what they are saying. Your yearly job performance evaluation is also usually in this file.
Do not expect to use the staff handbook (if there is one) in your defense. They will say things like: it is being revised and is not in effect at this time, or we (or those at the main office) are in the process of updating it, or something similar.
Since I think and observe fairly well, I have heard about various kangaroo courts in my life, from those in elementary school days on up to various jobs to divorce court (where, for some examples, motherhood is equated to sainthood, and a man is no good and must be punished by taking what he earned away from him, even though his wife committed adultery). In my opinion, divorce courts are more like kangaroo courts, and are full of lies and unfair "justice."
In my opinion, one of the most outrageous kangaroo courts a person was forced to go through happened after he just happened to ask "Do you realize you're eating better than the ........?" after he saw all the steaks, luncheon meats, drinks, and other goodies bought on ........ money for an outing. They held two days of hearings on what he asked (one question) to stress him out and bother him, to let him know they were boss, to let him know he must not question any of their actions, to let him know they were doing anything they wanted, to let him know he had no control over anything (including his own job and future), etc. For good measure they later made him pick up all the cigarette butts around the building, to exercise their control over him and show the rest of the staff they were in control and they'd better stay in line or they'd get similar treatment.
A kangaroo court is not a nice thing to go through; a sick organization is a bad place to work for the average worker, a horrible place for a worker who voices his opinion, believes in freedom of speech, and seeks the truth, and a good place to work for those in power and having fun at others' expense.
Adrian R. Lawler, Ph.D., (C) 2012 --
Sick organizations are fairly well known for their use of kangaroo courts to silence those that would question their actions, etc. They may initially call such courts "appeal hearings" or something similar, but in a sick organization the appeal hearing becomes a kangaroo court because you have now challenged the organization's "right" to do as they wish to you. They are going to defend their "right" to do as they wish to you, as their worker, and teach you a lesson. Kangaroo courts are generally held in response to an appeal you made to a decision they made (that you question) about you or your job.
Kangaroo Court is defined as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court
A kangaroo court is "a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted".
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Kangaroo+Court
An unfair, biased, or hasty judicial proceeding that ends in a harsh punishment; an unauthorized trial conducted by individuals who have taken the law into their own hands, such as those put on by vigilantes or prison inmates; a proceeding and its leaders who are considered sham, corrupt, and without regard for the law.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/kangaroo+court
any crudely or irregularly operated court, especially one so controlled as to render a fair trial impossible.
Kangaroo courts, by definition, are designed by the establishment so they win and you lose, and they teach you their lesson. They are mainly done to intimidate you and rest of staff, showing they can do anything to anybody at anytime, and that they are in control. A kangaroo court session is held to put someone down, to let them know who is boss, to stop criticism/talk before it gets started much, etc.
The Director/CEO of the sick organization usually chooses who will sit (usually 5 people) in judgement on the kangaroo court. They may give you one token choice of someone to sit at the hearing (they may ask for a list of several), and they choose one of those from your list who will judge you which will not mean anything in the final vote, because the vote is already rigged against you (4 votes to your one choice). This enables them to find out who ELSE thinks your way and needs to be controlled, so they can single them out for persecution, attitude adjustment, or firing, too. The kangaroo bunch gets together to question and beat up on you (their rules) and you have to sit there and take it while they go out for breaks, coffee, and to get more ammo (questions, charges) from other bullies not at "court" hearing.
They take great delight in watching you squirm and try to defend yourself against all sorts of charges against the sick organization, mostly various acts of supposed insubordination against your bully boss, false charges about your job performance, and your sayings to others. You cannot bring anyone in with you to help in your defense (like an attorney, or witness). They make up stuff, twist the truth, exaggerate, etc. everything so there is little truth anywhere in their charges against you. If they have instilled a little fear in you about what they can do, they have done what they wanted.
They have access to your personnel file where people have put anything they wanted for the time of your employment there. This is also "evidence" against you; you usually don't know what is in there and usually have no way to correct any false information. If you can, examine your personnel file to see what they are saying. Your yearly job performance evaluation is also usually in this file.
Do not expect to use the staff handbook (if there is one) in your defense. They will say things like: it is being revised and is not in effect at this time, or we (or those at the main office) are in the process of updating it, or something similar.
Since I think and observe fairly well, I have heard about various kangaroo courts in my life, from those in elementary school days on up to various jobs to divorce court (where, for some examples, motherhood is equated to sainthood, and a man is no good and must be punished by taking what he earned away from him, even though his wife committed adultery). In my opinion, divorce courts are more like kangaroo courts, and are full of lies and unfair "justice."
In my opinion, one of the most outrageous kangaroo courts a person was forced to go through happened after he just happened to ask "Do you realize you're eating better than the ........?" after he saw all the steaks, luncheon meats, drinks, and other goodies bought on ........ money for an outing. They held two days of hearings on what he asked (one question) to stress him out and bother him, to let him know they were boss, to let him know he must not question any of their actions, to let him know they were doing anything they wanted, to let him know he had no control over anything (including his own job and future), etc. For good measure they later made him pick up all the cigarette butts around the building, to exercise their control over him and show the rest of the staff they were in control and they'd better stay in line or they'd get similar treatment.
A kangaroo court is not a nice thing to go through; a sick organization is a bad place to work for the average worker, a horrible place for a worker who voices his opinion, believes in freedom of speech, and seeks the truth, and a good place to work for those in power and having fun at others' expense.
Adrian R. Lawler, Ph.D., (C) 2012 --
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
